Provenance Record

Well-structured News piece (830 words) with clear Overview/What We Know/What We Don't Know/Analysis sections. Direct quotes from Min Suh (Mousterian CEO) and Sung-an Choi (SHI Vice Chairman/CEO) are clearly attributed and reproduced verbatim from the press release. Specifics (50 MW per unit, July 22 2026 signing ceremony, ABS classification, Houston CCGT-adjacent pilot site, 2028 commissioning target, 474 GW ERCOT queue, 90% data-center share of requests) are each traceable to a cited source. Analysis section appropriately contextualizes the deal against MOL/Kinetics and MOL/Hitachi floating-data-center partnerships reported by Data Center Knowledge.

Read all 5 archived snapshots (gunzip'd .html.gz, sha256 verified against manifest.json for each): source-0.html.gz (PR Newswire, the joint press release) confirms the July 22, 2026 signing ceremony, the 50 MW/unit figure, ABS as classification society, the non-evaporative/zero-discharge cooling description, and both CEO quotes verbatim. source-1.html.gz (Data Center Knowledge) confirms the 'other partners... Capital Clean Energy Carriers, based in Greece, and Lloyd's Register' line verbatim, and confirms the MOL/Kinetics 2025 and MOL/Hitachi 2027 partnership claims used in the Analysis section, including the exact quoted phrase 'the world's first integrated floating data center platform.' source-2.html.gz (The Register) confirms the Houston CCGT-adjacent pilot-site detail, the Abbott ERCOT moratorium framing ('this week'), the 474 GW / 5x peak-demand / 90% data-center figures, and the 2028 target reference. source-5.html.gz (GCN) confirms Mousterian's Dallas HQ, SHI's 1974 founding/Seongnam HQ, and the Nautilus Data Technologies/Stockton CA floating-data-center leadership claim verbatim. source-6.html.gz (Utility Dive) confirms the 474 GW figure, the '5x peak demand' and '90 percent' figures verbatim from Abbott's letter as reported. Two sources (Techzine, Smart Maritime Network) returned HTTP 403 (bot-blocked) with no archive.org fallback captured by the fetcher, so per Step 3b I fetched both live URLs via WebFetch as a last resort: Techzine's live page confirmed both claims attributed to it verbatim in substance ('This allows for the simultaneous on-site fabrication of the modules and preparatory work, thereby shortening the overall completion time' for the parallel-construction claim, and 'Samsung expressed its ambition to commission the first operational facility by 2028' for the 2028 claim). Smart Maritime Network's live page confirmed it covers the same signing announcement and is a legitimate, bylined maritime-industry trade publication (Smart Maritime Network); it is listed in article.sources but not inline-cited in body_markdown, so no claim depends on it. No misattribution or hallucinated quotes found across any source.

Every specific and direct quote checked traces exactly to its cited source. No unsourced claims in the headline, summary, or lead. The 'What We Don't Know' section correctly identifies real open questions (no disclosed in-service date beyond 2028, no financial terms, unclear moratorium applicability) rather than manufacturing false uncertainty.

High-quality, thoroughly sourced submission. All 7 sources verified (5 from archived snapshots, 2 via live WebFetch fallback after bot-blocking). No factual, attribution, or tone issues found. Approved without corrections.