arXiv Caps Every Submitter at Two Papers a Month After a Record 40,363 Submissions in September
arXiv now limits submitters to two papers per calendar month and three active submissions, citing a surge in AI-assisted submissions that doubled volume in two years.
Overview
The preprint server arXiv has capped how many papers any one person can submit. According to arXiv’s announcement, it “now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month, with a limit of three total active submissions at any given time.” The post, written by Kat Boboris and dated October 1, 2026, says the policy applies “across all submitters and categories” and describes it as a stopgap while arXiv determines what may be the new best practice for authors using more advanced AI tools.
What We Know
- Volume. arXiv reports receiving 9,869 submissions in September 2016 and 20,569 in September 2024. This September it received 40,363, “a new record,” which generated almost 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. The post says submissions have doubled in only the past two years, with cs.AI showing an increase of over 6X while other categories roughly doubled.
- Cause. arXiv attributes part of the rise to AI tools. Its moderators, the post says, are seeing more thin papers of narrow scope, “salami” papers in which a single work is broken up into a set of smaller papers, and a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. arXiv’s policy still permits authors to use AI as a tool in support of their research as long as it is disclosed.
- Moderator burden. The post quotes Thomas Dietterich, Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Oregon State University and Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, as saying that “a relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time.” According to the post, this means other authors’ papers can be delayed for days or weeks.
- Rules in the FAQ. The limit counts submissions rather than announced papers, so rejected papers still count toward the monthly total. The limit applies across all subject categories. Papers still on hold from a prior month do not count against the new month’s limit but do count toward the three-paper active cap, which the post says has been in place since 2024. Papers deleted before announcement do not count, and the policy applies only to submitters, not co-authors.
Earlier Measures
The limit follows a separate AI-related rule announced in May. As The Next Web reported at the time, arXiv said it would ban researchers for one year if they submit papers with obvious signs of unchecked AI generation, such as hallucinated references or leftover chatbot instructions. The Next Web said that, after the ban, all subsequent submissions must first be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal before they can appear on the platform. It described the rule as a “one-strike” rule announced by Thomas Dietterich, whom it identified as chair of arXiv’s computer science section.
What We Don’t Know
- How long the limit will stay in place. arXiv says it will “continue to monitor the effect of this update on authors, readers, and the arXiv corpus, and modify as needed.”
- What the new best practice for AI-assisted authorship will be. The announcement frames the cap as a stopgap and does not set a date for a permanent policy.
- How many authors the cap affects. The post says only that a relatively small proportion of authors account for a disproportionate share of moderator time, and gives no figure.
Analysis
For AI researchers, the practical effect is rationing. With rejected papers counting toward the quota and a three-paper active ceiling, authors with several results ready must choose what to post first. arXiv itself asks authors with a backlog, or who need to submit at a specific time for a conference, to “plan their submissions carefully.”